Section 14
14.CIF scoresheet weighting (60 / 25 / 15)
The CIF scoresheet applies a fixed 60 / 25 / 15 split, with published sub-criteria within each band.[2]
14.1Need (60 marks)
| Sub-criterion | Max | Common evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Condition (GEMS / CDC2) | 30 | CDC2 report, surveyor report, photographs.[6] |
| Health, safety and compliance | 20 | FRA, EICR, asbestos register. |
| Educational impact | 10 | Loss-of-teaching-space data, curriculum disruption. |
14.2Cost (25 marks)
| Sub-criterion | Max | Common evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Cost certainty | 15 | Three competitive quotes or CCS framework rates.[12] |
| Value for money | 10 | Benchmark cost per square metre, lifecycle analysis. |
14.3Planning and deliverability (15 marks)
| Sub-criterion | Max | Common evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Planning permission status | 7 | Granted or not required statement. |
| Delivery programme | 8 | Gantt to September cut-off, contractor letter. |
14.4Typical winning total
The published outcomes register suggests funded bids typically cluster from around 75 to 85 marks out of 100, varying by project type and cycle.[3]
Governor paper output
Render this page as a single-column A4 document with running headers and source register reconciliation stamp, suitable for inclusion in a trust board pack without re-formatting.